翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Prosper ・ R v Quick ・ R v Rahey ・ R v Reed ・ R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal ・ R v Richards ・ R v Richardson ・ R v Rodgers ・ R v Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd ・ R v Ruzic ・ R v Ryan ・ R v S (RD) ・ R v Saibene ・ R v Sansregret ・ R v Saskatchewan Wheat Pool ・ R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) ・ R v Savage ・ R v Schoombie ・ R v Schoonwinkel ・ R v Seaboyer ・ R v Secretary of State for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith ・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1) ・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2) ・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg ・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p World Development Movement Ltd ・ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex p O'Brien ・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Doody ・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union ・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Northumbria Police Authority ・ R v Sharpe Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of) ''R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of)'' () 2 S.C.R. 1299 is a Supreme Court of Canada case where the Court defines the three types of offences that exist in Canadian criminal law and further defines the justification for "public welfare" offences. == Background == The city of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario hired Cherokee Disposal to dispose of the city's waste. The city built a disposal site 20 feet from a stream which, when filled by the disposal company, resulted in waste seeping into the stream. The city was charged with discharging, or permitting to be discharged, refuse into the public waterways causing pollution pursuant to section 32(1) of the Ontario Water Resources Act. The issue before the court was whether the city's offence should be classified as strict liability or absolute liability. The Court of Appeal for Ontario held that the charge required proof of mens rea which on the facts would acquit the defendant. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Sault Ste-Marie (City of)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.